I hope that the seven changes in the Windows 7 operating system

Although there are different opinions on the functions of Microsoft's next-generation operating system, Windows 7, in fact, users want to see a good, sufficient, efficient, and affordable price. A stable operating system.

According to some sources, Microsoft may be preparing to release the next Windows operating system sometime in 2009, which is currently called the Windows 7 by the media. Later, there was news that Microsoft recently said in an e-mail interview that Windows 7, the next-generation operating system, was still listed in 2010 as planned.

I don't know if this is the case, because online rumors are often unreliable. To be sure, Windows 7 is still in the early stages of development.

Although the details of the time and features of the official release of Windows 7 are not clear, Microsoft has provided the early code of Windows 7 "Milestone 1" to the "key partners". Therefore, Microsoft must begin to seriously consider the necessary features and functions of the next-generation operating system.

Windows Vista, which makes people love and hate, makes many users want it to disappear. Many people don't mind some of the new features of Vista itself, just an upset when they think that they need a supercomputer to run Vista smoothly. The hardware requirements of the operating system kernel should not be so high, so that in order to prepare to run this new operating system, it takes only one year to upgrade.

Users have a lot of suggestions for Windows 7, and they want to use the operating system to provide a variety of conveniences, such as a good browser, fast search file system features and other such excellent features. Does Mac OS X not include a browser? Do most Linux distributions include many open source software? Why can't Microsoft include the features and functionality that users obviously need? If I don't like the crash software that comes with the operating system, I usually uninstall or disable it and load other alternative software.

Below are some of the features and functionality that users want to see in the new version of the Windows operating system.

Less version

Since there were a lot of Windows Vista versions released, Microsoft made the original consumer who might upgrade. In the first few months after the release of Vista, the author received an email from many people asking me “ Which version should I choose? ” Microsoft only needs to develop two versions of Windows 7.

● One is the official version (some people call it the final version), including every feature that Microsoft wants to add and every inevitable expansion software.

● One is a streamlined performance version. This is a version for gamers. It should strive to be extremely streamlined after installation, load as little back-end garbage as possible, and almost hang up every service that is optional for gamers, including actually delivering the DirectX version promised before release.

More favorable prices

Nobody wants to pay a premium of at least $300 for any operating system. I would rather endure the difficulties of Linux than to upgrade to an overly large operating system. This is not just because I am a game enthusiast. But actually I had to run Windows, because few games were born to be developed for Linux, and packaging software like Windows would degrade performance. The final "end" version of the price should not exceed $150, and the lite version for "gamers" should be around $100.

Installation options are more comprehensive

I know that Microsoft is trying to simplify the installation of Vista by reducing the problem, but I think during the installation process, it should ask you how to deal with the problem you are experiencing. Reveal and configure services and features based on your preferences. And Vista tried to satisfy everyone's requirements in the end to force users who pursue high performance to change settings everywhere, and the results are not satisfactory.

User Account Control (UAC) should be more user-friendly

At almost every step of the operation, Windows needs to ask me if I really need to do this? I finally disabled UAC, so that the system would not have any pop-up boxes that confirm each step. I know that UAC is to ensure security and help prevent unauthorized programs from running, but as far as I know, most users have the habit of clicking the OK button on the UAC warning box when they are conditioned. They even look at the dialog box. Don't take a look. Perhaps UAC should adopt some kind of learning technology, so that you will not end up asking you the same operation; only temporarily interrupt the system when an abnormal situation occurs.

Optimizing is simpler

Developers should add everything that ends up in Windows 7 version of TweakUI to the "Control Panel" to avoid additional installation and let users You can adjust the interface when you feel it is appropriate. It also simplifies the extra things that are not needed but are still included, such as poor Windows games and rough programs (such as Sound Recorder), which are not very useful and only take up hard disk space.

Extra features in the final version

Microsoft, look at God's face, if you advertise a few months in advance: Buy “finally” version of the user will get extra features, then To fulfill the promise! I personally don't need any features included in BitLocker, Texas Hold & rsquo;Em or the final version; animated wallpaper? It's not needed, but I hope that after Windows 7 is released, additional features and functions can be released frequently. Otherwise, I think it is better not to advertise.

Discard the original kernel and redevelop a

Develop a new kernel so that the lower-configured computer can run the operating system smoothly, instead of having to have a multi-core processor, 128GB of RAM, and A computer that integrates a GPU of countless transistors. The role of the operating system is to allow users to use the computer instead of making it run slower.

Users have high hopes for Windows 7: I hope that Windows Vista will be dwarfed by the efficient, streamlined, and non-crashing code base. However, good hopes are one thing, and actual implementation may be very different. I hope that Microsoft will not let users down.