How to upgrade from XP to Windows 7?

When Windows 7 was released in the second half of this year or the first half of 2010, a large number of PC users will be upgraded from Windows XP. Users who still use XP will not do the "original state upgrade" like those of Vista users. This "original state upgrade" is just to let the new operating system overwrite the old system, still retaining the previous installation. Software, original settings and data. Instead, they have to go through a complete and thorough update, until they need to back up the original data and then install Windows 7 (uninstall XP or install it in another person's independent environment), then reinstall all kinds of software and Restore the data and finally reset it.

There are many XP users who refuse Vista, not only because of the Vista system, but also because of this upgrade mode, which makes it difficult for them to accept the new version of Vista. At InfoWorld, Microsoft's PR department assured XP users that there would be no more "original state upgrades" option this time, but they refused to explain why - a Microsoft spokesperson said "a further explanation of this issue in Windows 7 products ("InfoWorld is a well-known IT news comment site. After Vista went public, this site has launched "Save XP Action" - Translator Plus)

Why is the requirement for full update reasonable?

It is Gillner Consulting's research on Microsoft technology, Michael Silver, who gave a compelling reason why not support the "original state upgrade." The reason is that "original state upgrade" will bring the original virus, registry error and other damage performance defects in the user's Windows environment to Windows 7; if it is completely updated, these may not happen.

Silver also mentioned that typical commercial information technology will use the user system to completely update to avoid these problems, so for most companies, the lack of "original state upgrade" will be reversed. Become a problem that is not a problem.

Ordinary consumers and small companies may prefer to upgrade this option in the original state, but they may not like to completely update XP. Silver adds to this question: "Microsoft seems to be in a 'no win' situation - either supporting this state of the art upgrade and making users feel bad, or not supporting it but making it difficult for users to install and use the new system. "

" But in any case, most users implement a full update is not bad." He said this to users, including Vista users, recommending them to be completely updated to Windows 7 instead of the original state. Upgraded Vista.

Silver also reminds users who have not upgraded to Vista: If you want to upgrade, it is likely that some hardware (especially before 2006) will not run under Windows 7 or Vista; so it is best to start first. Try installing Windows 7 on a new computer. In any case, you can find the way to reinstall the original software and restore the settings and data after installing the new version of Windows.

Provide the original state upgrade for older versions

When Microsoft released Windows Vista, users can choose the original state upgrade or full update, but older versions of Windows users can only Choose the latter. So according to this precedent, if XP and earlier users want to upgrade to Windows 7, they can only be completely updated.

But in the second half of 2001, when Microsoft released Windows XP, both Windows 2000 users and earlier users (Windows 98, Windows Millennium, and Windows 98 SE) can choose The original status is updated. In a sense, the situation at the time was similar to the present. Microsoft Millennium is technically a failure, and users' bad comments forced Microsoft to release Windows 98 SE. This was followed by the replacement of the kernel and the rewrite of Windows 2000, and this fundamental change meant the incompatibility of new hardware requirements with a large number of peripherals and software. At the time, most users stayed on Windows 98 and Windows 98 SE, and Microsoft changed its route to XP - XP can provide the original status update for compatibility purposes.

Technically speaking, the change from Windows Vista to Windows 7 is not big, so the original status update for Windows XP to Windows 7 is now compared with the upgrade of Windows 98 users to Windows XP. It is easier. However, Silver mentioned "the problem of performance and security in the original state update" may make Microsoft not choose the same way as Windows 98 to Windows XP.

Silver compares Microsoft's situation with Apple's - Apple provides support for the previous three versions for users who want to upgrade to Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard (ie from Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar, 10.3 Panther and 10.4) Tiger upgrade). “This is a very efficient, easy and successful upgrade method, but Apple has limitations,” Silver said. This is because Apple has strong control over Mac OS-compatible hardware and a focused pursuit of the operating system.