Comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of Apache and IIS Comments

For SMEs to establish their own website, it is the most common thing to display their own pages. At present, the most popular WWW service tools are Apache and IIS. So what is the difference between them? Which tool is the best for us? Let's discuss this issue today.

I. Free and charge disputes:

Although many users use IIS to build websites, he is a component integrated in the Windows operating system. However, in order to legally use IIS, you must purchase a genuine Windows operating system.

In contrast to Apache, he is completely free. It can be downloaded and used for free without paying any fees.

Conclusion Apache is free, IIS charges, the former is dominant.

Second, stability:

The next thing to compare is stability. The WWW service should be running normally at any time. A website also needs to be open 24 hours a day, seven days a week. So stability is the focus of IIS and APACHE comparison.

IIS often has 500 errors in actual use, and sometimes there is an inexplicable phenomenon of suspended animation. Users need to restart the IIS service from time to time to ensure the website is normal.

Apache is more complicated to configure than IIS, but it can work long-term once it is set up. Large websites use APACHE as their own WWW service delivery tool. All configurations of APACHE are saved in the configuration file and are executed in full accordance with the information recorded in the configuration file. Generally, there will be no inexplicable suspended animation.

Tip: Using IIS in windows2003 system is better than using APACHE.

Conclusion APACHE is stable, IIS sometimes fakes, the former is dominant.

Third, scalability:

Extensibility refers to whether WWW service delivery tools can be applied to a variety of occasions, multiple network conditions, multiple operating systems.

IIS can only be used under Microsoft's Windows operating system. Without Windows, he will have nothing to do. Unable to port to other types of operating systems.

APACHE is a versatile person. He is not only used for windows, but he is also qualified for various operating systems such as unix, linux and freebsd. Moreover, the configuration steps of different operating systems are basically similar, and the portability is very high.

Conclusion IIS can only run under Windows, Apache has a wide range of applications. Apache won.

Fourth, security:

I often see a website hacked or a website is illegally uploaded by a malicious user, for the site that provides services for others, security Sex is the most important thing. If a website is not guaranteed by its own security, who is willing to browse and use it.

Early IIS had a big problem with security. If you use the default settings, hackers can easily get into it. However, Microsoft has made significant improvements in security in IIS6. As long as the operating system patches are updated in a timely manner, the website security factor can be increased as much as possible. In particular, IIS6 and the .net platform depend on each other to make security almost perfect. //This article transferred from www.45it.com.cn computer software and hardware application network

APACHE has been doing a good job in security, because many users are using apache under linux, so the operating system features make linux The apache has an innate umbrella, and the security naturally has nothing to say.

Conclusion The previous version of IIS6 has security risks, and IIS6 and APACHE are as secure and reliable. IIS6 and APACHE are tied.

V. Openness:

The so-called openness refers to whether the source code of the program is open. It is well known that IIS is part of the WINDOWS system, so his source code is not open. The apache is different. The earliest he was for the Unix-like system service, so the source code is completely open to the outside world. Anyone can analyze his code, discover the vulnerabilities, and issue patches to make up for the vulnerability.

Because of the openness of APACHE, it has also greatly improved its security.

Conclusion IIS does not open code, APACHE open source code. The latter won.

VI. Difficulties:

The difficulty of using a tool directly affects the number of users, especially web publishing tools. After all, many companies want to have their own websites, but they don't want to hire high-paying network administrators to maintain them. Therefore, it is inevitable to find a relatively easy tool to build your own site.

IIS is relatively simple to open, it is easy to let IIS work, publish the website. However, administrators are prone to misconfigurations and misoperations. But overall, IIS is still very easy to learn, but it is very difficult to learn him well.

The use of APACHE is more difficult than IIS, and it requires a certain computer and network foundation to use. His configuration is not graphical, it needs to be implemented by editing the configuration file. However, from the setting of APACHE, as long as we strictly follow the help file for parameter setting, there is still no difficulty.

Conclusion IIS is easy to install but difficult to master. APACHE installation is relatively difficult, and it is not an easy task to master. IIS has a slight advantage.

Seven, programmatic:

In order to make the web page more colorful, more beautiful, more interactive, the master has developed a variety of components and controls for us, then these controls are in IIS or Is it normal to run under APACHE?

The Mod Rewrite function under APACHE is very powerful, and the ISAPI Rewrite in IIS needs special development, which is generally not possible for beginners. APACHE can use Subversion WebDev and .htaccess functions, as well as ForceType. In addition, IIS support for FastCGI is not very good, so some CGI, PHP programs run very slowly, far less than apache.

Conclusion Different components are used in different environments, because the choice of IIS or APACHE is determined by the working environment, which is inconsistent.

Eight, support language:

Because of the current language of the establishment of websites and forums, such as ASP, PHP, JSP and other languages. So IIS and APACHE support them all?

IIS is very stable for ASP, especially .net, but it is more troublesome for PHP and JSP. PHP needs to be repeatedly configured to support on Windows 2003. APACHE is very good at supporting the above mentioned languages, running ASP, PHP, JSP without any problems.

Conclusion APACHE supports more languages. IIS supports PHP and JSP when it is a bit cumbersome and requires some configuration. APACHE won.

IX. Treatment:

Many readers may be more concerned about the treatment. How do IIS and APACHE still have treatment problems? In fact, what we are discussing here is the treatment of network administrators. . A network administrator who will be IIS and a network administrator who will be APACHE, their salary is not the same.

The biggest advantage of APACHE is that there are many configuration parameters. If you want to be proficient in APACHE, you need a high level. So the same level of network administrators will be better for APACHE than for IIS.

Conclusion Money is the only criterion for winning, APACHE is dominant.

Summary:

In fact, today we are here to argue that IIS is good or APACHE is not very meaningful, the comparison made in this article is only for those who are at the intersection of network administrators, do not know Read a tool to build a website for readers with a little reference. Only after you have a general understanding of IIS and APACHE can you plan for your future.

In general, the advantage of Apache is that it has the most comprehensive features, the widest support, relatively stable, and rich scalability in various open source WWW service providers. But just because of the scalability, performance is certainly not too high, only to maintain a medium level. IIS6 is still very powerful in handling connection and event performance, surpassing APACHE. In addition, IIS6 has a qualitative leap in security, which makes up for the shortcomings of IIS vulnerabilities. If your company's network environment is not responsible and does not involve too much development, it is recommended to still use IIS6. Of course, if it is developed and debugged on the WWW, it is more convenient to use APACHE.